Grants from the Israeli Consulate Should be Returned

This article was originally published by the Minnesota Spokesman Recorder on December 30, 2021.

The Israeli Consulate in Chicago announced Social Impact grants to three Minneapolis-based organizations, and held a ceremony on Thursday, December 9 to distribute the $5,000 checks to A Mother’s Love, Mr. Basketball Academy, and Minnesota STEM Partnership.

The irony of awarding “Social Impact” grants is astounding. This has been a year when the Israeli Defense Force (IDF) has killed hundreds of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, many of them children, demolished homes in Jerusalem and in the Naqab (Negev) desert, denied Palestinians the COVID vaccine, denied them freedom of movement, education, health care, water, livelihood, and arrested dozens of children from their beds at night.

In October, Israel declared that six human rights organizations are “terrorist” organizations, severely restricting their operations and funding.

What could motivate Israel to give American human rights organizations grants? Israel is suffering a public relations setback, which was exacerbated by their bombing of Gaza in May. Human rights abuses within Israel and the occupied territories have only intensified since then. Israel used to be able to apply oppression with impunity, but now there is increased awareness of the situation in the United States.

A growing number of US citizens are becoming sympathetic to Palestinians, and even favorable opinions of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement are increasing. (The BDS movement attempts to compel Israel to comply with international law through economic, cultural, and educational boycotts and divestment.)

Clearly, Israel feels the need to counter this growing sentiment in the US by showing its support for “social justice”–everywhere except in Israel.

Make no mistake: Israel targets Palestinians simply because they are Palestinians. The 2018 “Nation State Law,” one of the Basic Laws which substitute for Israel’s constitution, clearly states that non-Jews do not have the same rights in Israel as Jews. This law is Israel’s admission that it practices apartheid, as two human rights organizations (B’Tselem and Human Rights Watch) laid out in separate reports in 2021.

Do the three organizations receiving grants from Israel really want to accept money from an apartheid state? Do they want to do public relations work for a country whose laws enshrine Jewish supremacy?

In my world, social justice means equality. These Minneapolis organizations are working towards equality, healing from past and present injustices, and community uplifting. But those values are contradictory to all that Israel stands for–ethnic supremacy, settler colonialism, and apartheid.

Organizations working for social justice should not accept money from countries working for injustice and inequality. The three community organizations that received grants should return the money. This should be done publicly and loudly, proclaiming that, n the words of Martin Luther King, Jr., “injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.”

SHARE THIS

Deadly Exchange: Israel and US Policing

Since 2002, thousands of US law enforcement officials have trained with Israeli military forces in the context of the “War on Terror,” learning about Israeli methods and technologies of surveillance, racial profiling, and suppression of protest. As Black Lives Matter and other social movements seek accountability and an end to police violence, why are US police departments training with occupying Israeli forces? How do we resist the militarization of police and the criminalization of US citizens and immigrants? And how is the movement for Justice in Palestine organizing for justice and real safety from the US to Palestine?

Speaker Eran Efrati is the executive director of Researching the American-Israeli Alliance (RAIA), and an investigative researcher into the Israeli military and arms industry. He has worked with the International Criminal Court and participated in both independent and UN investigations into Israeli military operations. His investigative reports have appeared in The New York Times, The Washington Post, and The Guardian, among others. He currently serves as chair of the board for Jewish Voice for Peace, and his research focuses on military and police partnerships between the United States and Israel.

Thursday, August 12, 2021, 7 PM

Zoom: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/83334769540Facebook.com/WomenAgainstMilitaryMadness youtube.com/WomenAgainstMilitaryMadnesstwitter.com/WAMMwomen

SHARE THIS

When a Minnesota Law Silences Us

 

Two Minnesota laws, passed in 2017, prohibit the Legislature or any State Agency from contracting with any business or vendor that supports BDS or “discriminates against Israel.” Similar laws in states across the U.S. violate free speech rights protected by the 1st Amendment. Learn about the laws and efforts to have them repealed.

             Featured Speaker: Meera Shah Senior Staff Attorney, Palestine Legal

Register: HERE

For Information: mn@breakthebonds.org

Co-hosts: American Muslims for Palestine–MN, Jewish Voice for Peace–Twin Cities, MN BDS Community, Middle East Peace Now, MN Break the Bonds, MN Friends of Sabeel, Northfielders for Justice in Palestine/Israel, Palestine Israel Justice Project, Palestine Legal, Women Against Military Madness

SHARE THIS

Admit it: The two-state solution for Palestine is dead

This article, by Mary Christine Bader, is reposted from a Minneapolis Star Tribune opinion piece, August 7, 2020.

It’s not democracy, it’s apartheid.

Support for the “two-state solution” is the pious cover invoked by senators and members of Congress whenever they are asked to support Palestinian rights. Our politicians talk about two states even though Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has long spoken of “less than a state” to describe his vision of a future for Palestinians who demand equal rights in their ancestral land.

Now, with Netanyahu promising to annex a third of the West Bank Palestinian territory, illegally occupied by Israel since 1967, we are at the end of the zombie two-state myth. The choice for Israel and for its U.S. supporters is now clear: an apartheid Jewish-supremacist nation with millions of Indigenous people denied self-determination, freedom of movement, equal justice and other basic human rights — or the alternative, two peoples with equal rights living together in one state.

Many Jews will regard the latter as failure of the utopian Zionist dream of creating an exclusively Jewish nation state in a land inhabited by others.

The Jewish writer Peter Beinart, once a loyal two-state liberal Zionist, recently horrified supporters of Israel with his articles in the New York Times and Jewish Currents confessing that he no longer believes in a Jewish state. For that, some Jews are calling him a traitor.

Beinart’s sin seems to be letting his humanity override his liberal Zionist instincts. He has now declared his belief in a single, binational state with equal rights for all, explaining in the New York Times: “I knew Israel was wrong to deny Palestinians in the West Bank citizenship, due process, free movement and the right to vote in the country in which they lived. But the dream of a two-state solution that would give Palestinians a country of their own let me hope that I could remain a liberal and a supporter of Jewish statehood at the same time.”

Beinart and many others have seen that hope extinguished by Israel’s relentless building of Jewish-only settler colonies on Palestinian lands throughout the West Bank territory that Israel has occupied for 53 years, in violation of existing international law. Israel’s formal annexation that is planned would leave only noncontiguous enclaves for Palestinians to inhabit in their ancestral lands, erasing all hope for a viable, independent state of their own.

“It’s time,” Beinart concluded, “to abandon the traditional two-state solution and embrace the goal of equal rights for Jews and Palestinians. It’s time to imagine a Jewish home that is not a Jewish state.”

Palestinians have been imagining such a state for a long time.

In his latest book, “The Hundred Years’ War on Palestine,” Columbia University historian Rashid Khalidi reframes the long struggle for control of Palestine as a colonial war on the Indigenous population that has rationally resisted displacement by Zionist settlers for more than a century.

“With the establishment of Israel” Khalidi writes, “Zionism did succeed in fashioning a potent national movement and a thriving new people in Palestine.” But, despite a campaign of Zionist terror and the ethnic cleansing of 750,000 Palestinians, the Zionist movement “could not fully supplant the country’s original population, which is what would have been necessary for the ultimate triumph of Zionism.”

The fundamental colonial nature of Israel in Palestine must be acknowledged, Khalidi writes, but “there are now two peoples in Palestine, irrespective of how they came into being, and the conflict between them cannot be resolved as long as the national existence of each is denied by the other. Their mutual acceptance can only be based on complete equality of rights, including national rights, notwithstanding the crucial historical difficulties between the two. There is no other possible sustainable solution, barring the unthinkable notion of one people’s extermination or expulsion by the other.”

In general, Americans have not viewed Israel as a domineering colonial power. And considering our own colonial history, some Americans think we have no right to criticize Israel. No matter that U.S. taxpayers provide at least $4 billion a year to support Israel, a prosperous country that is the largest recipient of our foreign aid.

Our representatives in Congress refuse to put conditions on this aid for Israel’s behavior, be it annexing occupied land or imprisoning Palestinian children. They justify unqualified support for Israel by saying it is the “only democracy in the Middle East.” It is, however, a country that does not provide equality to all its people. Israel grants full rights only to a specific ethno-religious group, and it denies all rights to millions of other people under its control. That is not the kind of democracy embedded in the U.S. Constitution. That is apartheid.

As Israel prepares to formally annex the most fertile, most water-rich third of the Palestinian West Bank, will America continue to enable Israeli apartheid and the Hundred Years’ War on Palestine? Or will we help birth a true democracy based on equal rights? That is our choice.

Mary Christine Bader is a writer in Wayzata.

SHARE THIS

New Campaign: Repeal Minnesota’s Anti-BDS Laws

Background:
In 2017, after debates in both chambers of the Minnesota legislature, including testimony from many members of MN BBC and other organizations against the bills, the legislature approved two bills and Governor Dayton signed them into law. These laws (MN Statutes 3.226 and 16C.053) prohibit the state and the legislature from entering into contract with an individual who boycotts Israel.

During the debates the legislators tried to smooth out the wording to make it appear that the purpose of the laws was not to restrict speech that is protected under the First Amendment of the US Constitution, but instead to protect Israel from discrimination, but the revised wording failed at both. The laws are unconstitutional because they condition receiving contracts based on a political view (this was determined in a Supreme Court ruling NAACP v Claiborne Hardware Store). Furthermore, the laws do nothing to prevent discrimination. Discrimination and hatred against people and ethnic or religious groups are things that we absolutely and wholeheartedly condemn. We believe in human rights for everybody. But really, what does it mean to discriminate against a country? This is non-sensical.

We support many boycotts and divestment from companies and entities profiting from human rights abuses. We support efforts to impose sanctions on countries, including Israel, which commit widespread human rights violations. We know that Boycotts, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) are non-violent tactics to pressure countries to end their human rights violations. We know these tactics work to bring bad behavior into the open and to educate people in our communities and around the world about what is really happening in Israel/Palestine. And because they are such effective tactics, pro-Israel organizations have been working very hard to criminalize constitutionally protected behavior in Minnesota and around the country.

Even though the laws are unconstitutional, they were enacted and exist now in Minnesota’s Statutes. We now have a new campaign to repeal the unconstitutional laws.

What you can do:

We have made contact with many of our state legislators and have found several House members and Senators who will introduce a bill to repeal those unconstitutional laws. Please contact your members (one Senator and one Representative) and urge them to sign on as co-sponsor, or to vote for repeal when it comes up for a vote. Go to this website and input your address to find your representatives. Then call those members’ legislative aids and explain why you think they should support repeal. To help in this, we have placed talking points here.

When you finish, please write a short email to mn@breakthebonds.org and tell us how it went. Be sure to name the legislator whose office you contacted, and what their reaction was.

Many thanks!

Your friends in solidarity,

MN Break the Bonds Campaign

SHARE THIS

Parallel Liberation Struggles: Lessons in Resistance

Conference, Saturday, October 21, 2017, 10:00 am – 5:00 pm*

University of MN, Keller Hall, Room 3-210, 200 Union Street SE, Minneapolis, MN

*Registration: 9:30 am / Lunch will be provided

Conference is free and open to the public. Advanced registration is requested.


People under oppression suffer from three types of violence (Johan Galtung)

Structural violence  Direct Violence  Cultural Violence

as in Genocide, Apartheid, Ethnic Cleansing (Raphael Lemon)

Join us as we (1) commemorate the 100-year Palestinian resistance to Israel’s settler-colonial project and (2) explore the similarities in violence used against Palestinians, African Americans, and Native Americans and their methods of resistance.


Speakers:

Philip Weiss

Mondoweiss.net

Dhoruba bin Wahad

Black Panthers

Nadia Ben-Youssef

Adalah Justice Project

Alan O. Gross

American Indian Movement

Jennifer Bing

AFSC, No Way to Treat a Child


Raven Ziegler

Lakota Sioux Activist

Erika Levy

Jewish Voice for Peace

 


Please register here


Sponsoring Organizations: MN Break the Bonds Campaign, Women Against Military Madness – Middle East Committee, Anti-War Committee, Middle East Peace Now, Jewish Voice for Peace – TC, National Lawyers Guild, American Muslims for Palestine, Students for Justice in Palestine, Minnesotans Against Islamophobia, Socialist Action.


SHARE THIS

2016 Minnesota Precinct Caucuses

The 2016 MN precinct caucuses are coming up on MARCH 1ST and the Minnesota Break the Bonds Campaign has prepared a critically important resolution for you to share with your community. First the resolution – then some background!


Because the Minnesota State Board of Investment invests a sizeable portion of the state’s nearly $100 billion taxpayer-funded public employee pension fund in foreign, corporate, and government securities without restriction (which may include arms dealers, carbon polluters, sweat-factories and apartheid states), mandatory environmental, labor and human rights investment guidelines should be enacted by the legislature to ensure that Minnesota is not financially complicit in the violation of universally recognized environmental, labor and human rights standards.


Background of the Resolution

We pushed hard for the State Board of Investment (SBI) to adhere to their own guidelines when it came to investing our money. The ethical guidelines made it clear that Minnesotans value human rights, labor rights and environmental protections, and any fund manager that wanted to invest public money in a country that did not take those values seriously would have to be able to justify their proposal to invest in them. The SBI, saying that they never used those guidelines anyway, voted in 2015 to throw the guidelines out! Regardless of the flaws in the way these former guidelines were used (or not used), it is unacceptable that the SBI would rather get rid of all ethics guidelines (read: constraints) for their investments than reform them, so that they are usable. This resolution calls for the creation of new guidelines that can’t be brushed aside, guidelines that will be law, enacted by the legislature, that require the SBI to follow. Without the creation of new mandatory ethical guidelines the SBI will continue investing our money in dozens of enterprises, which violate human rights, labor rights, and damage the environment. Without this resolution, the SBI will continue making every Minnesotan complicit in funding international and local human suffering and poisoning the environment.

What You Can Do

1. Plan to Attend Your Precinct Caucus on MARCH 1ST – Figure out now where your caucus location is and make sure you are registered to vote! Caucusing is just as important as voting in the general election, if not more. It’s your biggest opportunity to influence your party’s platform and let our representatives know what they need to support to get our votes! This is done by introducing a resolution that you’d like the party to endorse. To find your caucus location, please see the Resources section at the bottom of the page.

2. Bring This Resolution and A Resolution Form to Your Caucus on MARCH 1ST – To introduce a resolution you need a resolution form. You can write the resolution on the form itself or staple it to the back.

3. Introduce the Resolution During the Appropriate Time – Ask whoever is leading the caucus when resolutions will be introduced, and let them know you have one. To introduce the resolution you can read the background section above or put it in your own words. Make sure to speak about why you personally support it! Tell your neighbors why you think they should support it! Are we going to let our government use tax-payers’ money to commit human rights abuses or pollute the environment?

4. Vote for the Resolution!

5. Tell Us What Happened – Regardless of whether the resolution passes or not in your precinct, please tell us about it. Did it pass? By how much? Were there questions? A debate? What kinds of comments were made? Send an email to mn@breakthebonds.org

6. What Happens If It Passes? – Resolutions that pass will advance to be evaluated by your party Platform Committee, then the State Convention. If enough precincts pass the resolution, there is a good chance of getting the resolution onto the party platform.

Register to Vote: https://www.usa.gov/register-to-vote#item-212126
Precinct Caucus Location:
Find your DFL Caucus location: https://www.dfl.org/about-our-party/caucuses-conventions/
Find your GOP Caucus location: http://mngop.com/precinct-caucuses/
Find your GPMN Caucus location: http://mngreens.nationbuilder.com/dstrand/green_party_of_minnesota_caucuses_2016

Read below for Talking Points to take to the Caucuses. These will help if you get questions.

Continue reading 2016 Minnesota Precinct Caucuses

SHARE THIS

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS DELIVER PETITION DEMANDING SEC DISCLOSE ISRAEL BONDS FUND ILLEGAL SETTLEMENTS

Contact: Sylvia Schwarz at 651-485-5269 or Robert Kosuth at 218-724-4800.

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS DELIVER PETITION DEMANDING SEC ENFORCE DISCLOSURE RULES ON ISRAEL BONDS

Palestinian rights activists are calling on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to enforce U.S. law in the sale of Israel Bonds, the latest attempt by human rights groups to ensure the U.S. government is implementing its own policies concerning Israeli actions.

On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 activists from Minnesota Break the Bonds (MN BBC), the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation, Jewish Voice for Peace, and US Palestinian Community Network delivered a petition to the SEC signed by more than 6,400 people demanding the agency implement an existing law that requires a seller of securities in the United States disclose all material facts about the security to potential investors.
The petition contends that by failing to disclose to investors that money received from the sale of Israel bonds is used for projects that violate international law, the Development Corporation of Israel (DCI) is withholding facts that would cause a prudent investor to make a different investment decision.

“The US government has a responsibility to enforce US laws. It is longstanding US policy that Israeli settlements built on stolen Palestinian land are illegal and a major obstacle to peace so how can the SEC allow investors to unknowingly invest in these activities?” said Robert Kosuth from MN BBC, which started the petition and has campaigned to have the State of Minnesota dump its multi-million dollar pension fund investment in Israel Bonds.

Money received from the sale of Israel Bonds is deposited into Israel’s pooled General Treasury accounts, which are used to fund projects such as building settlements, illegal under the Fourth Geneva Convention, and constructing the separation wall, declared illegal by the International Court of Justice in 2004. The DCI omits these material facts from its prospectuses and only states that the money is used for “general purposes of the state.”

Earlier this month DCI announced that it had surpassed one billion dollars in US sales for the third year running. The largest institutional investors in Israel Bonds in the United States are state and municipal employee retirement funds. MN BBC believes that it is unlikely that any public fund fiduciary who is properly informed of all material facts about the use of Israel Bonds would invest public funds knowing that the money will be used to violate international criminal law.

“Retirement fund managers who purchase securities knowing that the funds will be used to violate international criminal law are in breach of their fiduciary duties,” Robert Kosuth said.

The SEC has not yet responded to the petition.

The Israel Bonds issue is only one example of how the United States fails to clamp down on funding for Israel’s illegal activities. In December Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz detailed how US donors had given settlements more than $220 million in tax-exempt funds over five years. A group of American citizens filed a lawsuit on December 21 against the US Department of Treasury seeking to stop nonprofit groups from sending donations to support settlements and the Israeli army.

“The US government keeps insisting that it seeks peace between Palestinians and Israelis but continues to allow Israel to act with complete impunity. It is long past time for the United States to end its complicity in the denial of Palestinian rights and a major step would be to end the material support Israel receives to continue its policies, support that violates US laws,” said Ramah Kudaimi of the US Campaign to End the Israeli Occupation.

###

SHARE THIS

We Support Students for Justice in Palestine

Editor’s note: A shortened version of the following was published in the October 27, 2015 issue of the Minnesota Daily:

When Fadi Alloun became the second Palestinian teenager in as many days to be killed by Israel, the campus chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) re-posted a report by Electronic Intifada on their Facebook page. For this they were attacked as supporters of terrorism and “disgusting.” As this is only the most recent of attacks on SJP, several organizations issued the following statement:

“For months the world has watched as the racial violence in Palestine perpetrated by Israeli civilians escalates while the Israeli government refuses to hold accountable those responsible. The extrajudicial execution of Fadi Alloun is a recent example. No attempt was made to arrest Alloun; he was killed by the military urged on by a mob of Israeli settlers. Only after his killing was he accused of having perpetrated a knife attack on an Israeli Jew, as if an excuse was needed to kill him without due process.

“The accusation is typical of a mentality that claims victimhood for the oppressors. The world is slowly waking up to Israel’s human rights violations.

“Members of the SJP student group at the University of Minnesota are helping Minnesotans wake up and learn about these human rights violations. But as any human rights activist knows, exposing Israel’s human rights abuses and international law violations makes one vulnerable to accusations of anti-Semitism from pro-Israel advocates. These advocates, bankrolled by wealthy right-wing neo-cons like Shelden Adelson, spend millions attempting to silence advocates for human rights, especially advocates for Palestinian rights, and most especially those on campuses in the US.

“Recently, the SJP became the target of some of these pro-Israel forces and has been on the receiving end of threats and accusations.

“This fits perfectly into the model that the Israel advocacy organizations typically use: accuse the students of anti-Semitism for speaking against Israeli human rights abuses, escalate to accusations of “incivility” (see Steven Salaita’s new book, Uncivil Rights), and get the university to cancel events or even suspend a student group for exercising their First Amendment rights.

“These tactics are all spelled out in a new report by the Center for Constitutional Rights and Palestine Legal called “The Palestine Exception to Free Speech.” Threats to First Amendment rights should concern everybody, regardless of one’s stance on Israel or Palestine.

“Tactics going beyond suppression of speech, such as disrupting future job prospects or threatening bodily harm are also in the pro-Israel advocacy arsenal, and should trouble all Americans.

“All who value human rights must equally value Palestinian human rights. All who value constitutional rights should be proud and humbled by the courageous students of SJP who speak out for justice and equality in the face of suppression tactics. “

Signatories:

Minnesota Break the Bonds Campaign2015 SJP
Coalition for Palestinian Rights – MN
Women Against Military Madness – Middle East Committee
Middle East Peace Now
Anti-War Committee
Minnesota BDS Community
United States Palestinian Community Network

SHARE THIS

Why Using Pension Money to Fund Israeli Bonds is both Wrong and Illegal

by James Abourezk

This piece first appeared in CounterPunch on March 27, 2015. James Abourezk is a former US senator from South Dakota. He is the author of: Advise and Dissent: Memoirs of an ex-Senator.

The Minnesota State Board of Investment is honor bound when it invests monies from Minnesota’s public employee pension funds. Each of the Board members, which includes Governor Mark Dayton (Chair), State Auditor Rebecca Otto, Secretary of State Steve Simon and Attorney General Lori Swanson know, or should know, that the Board has violated its fiduciary responsibility to only invest public pension funds prudently by investing in Israel Bonds. Israel Bonds are government bonds issued by the State of Israel.

Earlier this monthI appeared before the Board members to urge them not to invest in Israel Bonds. Immediately after I ended my presentation, the Governor handed the other Board members a previously prepared written motion to continue investing the state’s pension funds in Israel Bonds. All of us in the packed hearing room understood that my testimony had been wasted. Facing members of the pro-Israel Lobby who had been seated in the front row, three of the four board members voted to invest. Only the State Auditor, Rebecca Otto, voted against the motion.

I’ve seen this pressure before. It usually consists of a subliminal threat by the pro-Israel Lobby to cut off any campaign money to those who defy what the Lobby wants. That is the same kind of threat that allowed Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu to travel to the United States to dictate to our Congress how American foreign policy should be conducted. I believe that the 36 standing ovations for Bibi and the 47 Republican Senatorial signatures on the letter to Iran were eager messages to the Israeli Lobby telling them how much Congress appreciated the campaign money given each election cycle to its obedient members. When I served in the US Senate I well remember the threats directed against me for not being obedient enough to the Lobby.

The Board of Investment’s vote to use Minnesota pensioners’ money to buy the low-yield bonds issued by Israel is, without question, highly imprudent and illegal, especially because the Board knows how the money will be used. American money plunged into Israel Bond sales is fungible, meaning that the money is lumped into Israel’s General Fund, and then used for anything Israel wants, without
abourezkrestriction. That also means that the money sent to Israel is used for settlements. Israel’s settlements are illegal under Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention, which prohibits an occupier from transferring any part of its civilian population into the territory it occupies. Article 49 was adopted by the international community after WWII as a direct response to Nazi Germany’s illegal and brutal occupation of lands belonging to its neighbors. Both the United States and Israel have signed the Fourth Geneva Convention.     Even the United States Government has acknowledged that Israel’s settlements are illegal.

Beyond just exploiting American elected officials in their political zeal to become complicit in financing illegal Israeli settlements by using money from taxpayer funded public employee pension plans to do so, Israel has a long history of inflicting damage on American interests. During the 1967 Middle East War, Israel’s military attacked and attempted to sink a fully flagged American Navy vessel—the USS Liberty—which had been ordered to monitor the War by assuming a listening post off the coast of Egypt and Israel. Using fighter jets, as well as torpedo boats, Israel killed 34 American sailors and wounded another 171 sailors in the process.

What was painful for the survivors and the families of those Americans killed and wounded by Israel were the duplicitous actions of our own public officials, starting with President Lyndon Johnson, by refusing to allow fighter jets of the Sixth Fleet to come to the aid of the Liberty when it was under attack and working to cover up evidence of Israel’s deliberate attack on our ship and the killing and wounding of our sailors.

That wasn’t the last injury against American interests by our so called “ally.” In the 1970s, Israel recruited and paid a Pentagon employee, Jonathan Pollard, to sell to Israel a “truckload of secret documents,” as described by our then Secretary of Defense, Caspar Weinberger.

More recently, a Pentagon official, Larry Franklin, was indicted by the Justice Department in 2004 for handing over classified information on Iran to two employees of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), the leading lobby for Israel. Franklin, a former United States Department of Defense employee, pleaded guilty to several espionage-related charges and was initially sentenced in January 2006 to nearly 13 years in prison. Amazingly, Franklin’s sentence was later reduced to ten months house arrest and 100 hours of community service. In reducing his sentence, the Judge told Franklin that his community service should consist of “speaking to young people about the importance of public officials obeying the law.”

Franklin had passed highly classified information to AIPAC policy director Steven Rosen and AIPAC senior Iran analyst Keith Weissman, whom AIPAC later fired. Initially indicted for illegally conspiring to gather and disclose classified national security information to Israel, all charges against Rosen and Weissman were eventually dismissed.

These are just a few examples that we know about where Israel’s activities have seriously damaged United States interests. What we do not know, including the extent of the duplicity of our public servants, would most likely fill the pages of a book.

Not only is the Investment Board’s action imprudent and illegal with respect to giving Minnesota retirees’ money to a country that has never hesitated in harming America’s interests and will use the money to violate international law, it also tells Israel that it can do what it wishes, without paying any penalty, and that it can even get the United States to pay the price for it.

The Minnesota Investment Board should obey the law whether or not Israel’s Lobby dislikes that decision.

SHARE THIS

Divest for Justice in Palestine!